Barton v. Portland

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “A municipal corporation is under no obligation to open a dedicated street until its use is deemed necessary by the common council.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• McCoy v. Thompson
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1917-05-01· cited 21×
• SWEET v. Irrigation Canal Co.
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1953-03-04· cited 20×
• City of Molalla v. COOVER ET UX.
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1951-08-14· cited 16×
• LDS Development, LLC v. City of Eugene
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-08-16· cited 10×
• Portland Ry., L. & P. Co. v. Oregon City
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1917-07-17· cited 8×
• Prosch v. City of La Grande
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1973-09-28· cited 2×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Bayard v. Standard Oil Co.
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1901-01-14· cited 21×
• Schooling v. Harrisburg
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1903-02-24· cited 20×
• Silverton v. Brown
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1912-12-10· cited 12×
• Grady v. Dundon
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1897-03-01· cited 11×
• Cruson v. City of Lebanon
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1913-04-15· cited 7×
• Booth v. Prineville
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1914-09-15· cited 4×