· 3/16/1932
Barton v. Nevada Consolidated Copper Co.
Citations
- 58 F.2d 646
- 1932 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1201
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that defendant’s belief about the prosecution’s intent was, “at best, mere conjecture and speculation” because “[t]here is simply no record evidence that unearths the inner-thoughts of the prosecutors”
- holding that defendant’s belief about the prosecution’s intent was, “at best, mere conjecture and speculation” because “[t]here is simply no record evidence that unearths the inner-thoughts of the prosecutors”
- holding that defendant’s belief about the prosecution’s intent was, “at best, mere conjecture and speculation” because “[t]here is simply no record evidence that unearths the inner-thoughts of the prosecutors”
- holding that defendant’s belief about the prosecution’s intent was, “at best, mere conjecture and speculation” because “[t]here is simply no record evidence that unearths the inner-thoughts of the prosecutors”
- holding that defendant’s belief about the prosecution’s intent was, “at best, mere conjecture and speculation” because “[t]here is simply no record evidence that unearths the inner-thoughts of the prosecutors”
- holding that defendant’s belief about the prosecution’s intent was, “at best, mere conjecture and speculation” because “[t]here is simply no record evidence that unearths the inner-thoughts of the prosecutors”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Norcross
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.