Bartoli v. Baiunco

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• considering, inter alia, that a defendant was never told he was free to leave in determining he was in custody for Miranda purposes
• rejecting defendant’s contention that “a person in [the defendant’s] position would have reasonably viewed [an officer’s] statement” as an impermissible hope of benefit “[u]nder the totality of the circumstances”
• defendant sought suppression of his custodial statement before the trial court, which was denied, but the case was remanded for the trial court to consider suppression in light of a change in the applicable law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).