Bartlette v. Crittenden

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining that “an appellant receiving a remand under the rule of retroactive application, that is, an appellant who receives a remand solely because of a change in case-law during the pendency of his or her appeal, is not an EAJA prevailing party”
• “[A]n appellant receiving a remand under the rule of retroactive application, that is, an appellant who receives a remand solely because of a change in caselaw during the pendency of his or her appeal, is not an EAJA prevailing party.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).