Skip to main content
· 5/6/1895

Bartlett v. Reichenecker

Citations

  • 11 Wash. 692
  • 40 P. 339
  • 1895 Wash. LEXIS 361

Syllabus

<p>RECEIVERS — LIABILITIES — PAYMENT OP MONEYS UNDER DIRECTION OP COURT.</p> <p>A receiver who, without securing a modification of a decree which is inconsistent with the findings and conclusions of the court, has followed the court’s conclusions and made payment of funds accordingly, can he compelled to pay a claimant a sum of money in excess of what is remaining in his hands, where this sum is due according to the decree as actually rendered.</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The purpose of a temporary injunction is not to resolve a dispute on the merits, but rather to preserve the status quo until the final hearing when full relief may be granted.”
  • “The purpose of a temporary injunction is not to resolve a dispute on the merits, but rather to preserve the status quo until the final hearing when full relief may be granted.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Anders

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.