Bartlett v. Mutual Pharmaceutical Company, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• most of respondent’s experts’ testimony was “drawn directly from the medical literature or published FDA analyses”
• “if the jury found that sulin- dac’s risks outweighed its benefits, then it could consider whether the warning—regardless of its adequacy—re- duced those risks . . . to such an extent that it eliminated the unreasonable danger”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).