Bartlett & Co., Grain v. Union Pacific Railroad

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The questions concerning tariff construction are intertwined with the reasonableness of the practice of refusing switching service____ These further considerations compel the conclusion that primary jurisdiction is in the [Board]”
• “In the present case ... the adequacy of the service being rendered and its reasonableness are in issue. Primary jurisdiction applies where, as here, the issues involve relevant considerations which the court cannot properly evaluate.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).