Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 7/23/1984
Bartles v. Livingston
Citations
- 319 S.E.2d 707
- 282 S.C. 448
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating an appellate court \is not limited to the reasoning of the parties or the trial court in addressing\ the issues before it
- determining a party was bound in all subsequent proceedings by a foreclosure decree it did not appeal
- this court is not limited to the reasoning of the trial court in addressing issues raised on appeal
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bell, Sanders, Gardner
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
16 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Langley v. BoyterCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1984-11-29· cited 45×
- Island Car Wash, Inc. v. NorrisCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1987-04-06· cited 44×
- Lewis v. Premium Investment Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2002-08-05· cited 41×
- Southern Welding Works, Inc. v. K & S Construction Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1985-06-11· cited 29×
- Ramage v. RamageCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1984-09-25· cited 20×
- Cogdill v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1986-08-04· cited 16×
- Litchfield Co. of South Carolina, Inc. v. KiriakidesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1986-09-22· cited 14×
- Harrison v. Owen Steel Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2018-01-10· cited 14×
- Butler v. LindseyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1987-09-08· cited 13×
- Boykin v. BoykinCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1988-06-06· cited 7×
- Peoples Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Myrtle Beach Retirement Group, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1990-07-02· cited 4×
- Brock v. Board of Adjustment & AppealsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1992-07-13· cited 3×
- American General Financial Services, Inc. v. BrownSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2008-02-27· cited 2×
- Wallace v. DayCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2010-06-16
- Foothills Mall v. FarrellCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1986-03-31
- Buffalo Creek investments, Inc. v. Stephen H. PettusCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2023-05-03
Cites
19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Camden v. MayhewSupreme Court· 1889-01-14· cited 58×
- Dunkley v. Van BurenNew York Court of Chancery· 1818-02-26· cited 38×
- Baker v. WeaverCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1983-11-28· cited 34×
- Zorn Ex Rel. Estate of Zorn v. CrawfordSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1969-01-22· cited 32×
- MacKey v. Kerr-McGee Chemical Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1984-02-06· cited 24×
- Perpetual Building & Loan Ass'n v. BraunSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1978-03-07· cited 19×
- Rosamond Enterprises, Inc. v. McGranahanSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1983-01-06· cited 14×
- Sandel v. CousinsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1975-12-30· cited 13×
- Anderson v. PilgramSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1889-03-30· cited 12×
- Allen v. HatchellSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1963-06-06· cited 8×
- Ruff v. DotySupreme Court of South Carolina· 1887-02-28· cited 8×
- Matthews v. EslingerCourt of Appeals of Tennessee· 1955-01-07· cited 7×
- Makani Development Co., Ltd. v. StahlHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 1983-12-08· cited 7×
- Parr v. LindlerSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1893-12-01· cited 6×
- Sullenberger v. O'LeeSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1946-02-25· cited 4×
- Massey Ferguson Credit Corp. v. CoxCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1984-02-17· cited 4×
- LeConte v. IrwinSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1885-05-19· cited 2×
- Hull v. YoungSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1888-06-26· cited 2×
- Gray v. ToomerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1852-01-15· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.