Barthet v. Estebene

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that comments about “exciting results” and “continuous 9 improvements” to be mere puffery
• finding that 1 although defendant “did not provide ‘specific’ data” about a key metric, defendant’s 2 statement regarding the metric’s dependence on market forces strongly implied that he had 3 access to the disputed information
• finding CW statements do not establish scienter because “the allegations in the 3 Complaint do not permit the Court to conclude that any CW had personal knowledge of the 4 individual defendants’ state of mind.”
• finding 15 CW statements do not establish scienter because “the allegations in the Complaint do not permit the 16 Court to conclude that any CW had personal knowledge of the individual defendants’ state of 17 mind.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).