· 4/5/2011
Barth v. KANTOWSKI
Citations
- 948 N.E.2d 276
- 409 Ill. App. 3d 420
- 350 Ill. Dec. 207
- 2011 Ill. App. LEXIS 310
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- a litigant may not raise a new legal theory for the first time in a motion to reconsider
- “[A] litigant may not raise a new legal theory for the first time in a motion to reconsider.”
- a party may not raise -8- 2014 IL App (2d) 130968 a new legal argument in a motion to reconsider
- a party may not raise a new legal argument in a motion to reconsider
- “We acknowledge that a judgment can be revived 20 years after it was entered.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Schmidt
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.