Bartfield v. Murphy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a LLC was a necessary party to “derivative claims raised on its behalf’
• concluding that an LLC had an interest in “derivative claims raised on its behalf” and thus was a necessary party
• concluding that an LLC had an interest in “derivative claims raised on its behalf” and thus was a necessary party
• dismissing derivative claims because joining the LLC' as a necessary party would destroy complete diversity where a plaintiff and a defendant were both members of the LLC
• “Plaintiffs characterization of his claim as one for declaratory relief does not remedy” his inability to join a non-diverse LLC as a defendant
• party indispensable where the plaintiff had a state court remedy that could avoid prejudice to any party

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).