Skip to main content
· 9/19/1975

Bartalo v. Superior Court

Citations

  • 51 Cal. App. 3d 526
  • 124 Cal. Rptr. 370
  • 1975 Cal. App. LEXIS 1393

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the claims of a “new and additional party” do not relate back to a timely filed complaint unless the new party was substituted for an original party erroneously joined
  • holding that the claims of a “new and additional party” do not relate back to a timely filed complaint unless the new party was substituted for an original party erroneously joined

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hastings

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.