Skip to main content
· 5/14/2001

Barry v. Wing Memorial Hospital

Citations

  • 142 F. Supp. 2d 161
  • 7 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 14
  • 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6350
  • 80 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 40,607
  • 2001 WL 521753

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that the FMLA “does not address the cause of an employee’s injury”
  • observing that the FMLA “does not address the cause of an employee’s injury”
  • employer intent is irrelevant in prescriptive’ claims, but ‘[w]ith prescriptive rights ... the issue is whether the employer took the adverse action because of a prohibited reason or for a [proper] one’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ponsor

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.