Barry v. United States Capitol Guide Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that plaintiff must provide more than mere “speculation” that defendant “harbored retaliatory animus against the plaintiff”
• “[T]he plaintiff must submit proof beyond mere knowledge about protected activity and speculation that [defendant] harbored retaliatory animus[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).