Barry v. Stanco Communications Products, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• overruling cases “to the extent that they hold a covenant not to compete which applies to the whole state is always void and will never be enforced”
• “[T]he territorial limitation in this case was reasonable, and a legitimate protection of Stanco’s invest- ment in customer relations.”
• “[T]he territorial limitation in this case was reasonable, and a legitimate protection of [the employer’s] investment in customer relations.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).