Barry v. Kingdon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the common law evolves through the “incremental process of common-law adjudication as a response to the facts presented”
• arguing that dissent “confuses” choice of law rules in contract disputes with those in tort cases
• finding that courts should use the “center or gravity” or “grouping of contacts” test to determine what state’s law governs a contract cause of action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).