Barry v. City of Cloverport

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that court orders are not intended as first drafts subject to revisions at a litigant’s pleasure and, as a result, a movant must establish extraordinary circumstances supporting reconsideration
• To prevail on a motion for reconsideration, the party must show “clear and obvious error where the interests of justice demand correction.” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
• “[A] motion for reconsideration is not an appeal, and thus it is improper on a motion for reconsideration to ask the Court to rethink what it has already thought through—rightly or wrongly.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).