Barry Mark, Kelly D. Feig, and The Law Office of Kelly D. Feig, P.A.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that the loss of a family business a plaintiff has operated for decades cannot easily be quantified
• explaining that exclusive dealing is cause for antitrust concern only if there is injury to competition
• stating that a damage remedy may be inadequate if a defendant may become insolvent before a final judgment can be entered and -5- collected
• observing that courts have taken a \sliding scale\ approach to the determination of whether a stay is appropriate
• noting that exclusive dealing contracts of less than one year are presumptively lawful
• holding that a damages remedy can be inadequate if (1) plaintiff becomes insolvent or loses its business; (2) plaintiff is unable to finance the lawsuit; or (3) plaintiff incurs damages that are very difficult to calculate; or (4) defendant becomes insolvent or loses its business

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).