Barry Jay Feldman v. Gary L. Henman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a district court generally “should not entertain a habeas corpus 7 petition while there is an appeal pending in [the Ninth Circuit]”
• dismissing defendant's premature habeas petition \because the district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to entertain[the] petition\
• dismissing defendant's premature habeas petition \because the district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to entertain[the] petition\
• dismissing defendant’s premature 17 habeas petition “because the district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction 18 to entertain[the] petition”
• dis- missing defendant’s premature habeas petition “because the district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to entertain [the] petition”
• dis- missing defendant’s premature habeas petition “because the district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to entertain [the] petition”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).