Skip to main content
· 6/12/1995

Barry Harlem Corp. v. Kraff

Citations

  • 652 N.E.2d 1077
  • 273 Ill. App. 3d 388
  • 210 Ill. Dec. 101
  • 1995 Ill. App. LEXIS 419

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • statement which does not mention plaintiff by name cannot be defamatory per se as to her
  • allegations that the plaintiff “ha[d] lost patients who would have otherwise presented themselves for treatment”
  • allegation that upon information and belief, the plaintiff lost patients who would have otherwise presented themselves for treatment
  • “To state a cause of action [for commercial disparagement], plaintiff must show that defendant made false and demeaning statements regarding the quality of another’s goods and services.”
  • allegations that the plaintiff \ha[d] lost patients who would have otherwise presented themselves for treatment\
  • allegation that upon information and belief, the plaintiff lost patients who would have otherwise presented themselves for treatment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Buckley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.