Appellate Court of Illinois· 6/12/1995
Barry Harlem Corp. v. Kraff
Citations
- 652 N.E.2d 1077
- 273 Ill. App. 3d 388
- 210 Ill. Dec. 101
- 1995 Ill. App. LEXIS 419
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- statement which does not mention plaintiff by name cannot be defamatory per se as to her
- allegations that the plaintiff “ha[d] lost patients who would have otherwise presented themselves for treatment”
- allegation that upon information and belief, the plaintiff lost patients who would have otherwise presented themselves for treatment
- “To state a cause of action [for commercial disparagement], plaintiff must show that defendant made false and demeaning statements regarding the quality of another’s goods and services.”
- allegations that the plaintiff \ha[d] lost patients who would have otherwise presented themselves for treatment\
- allegation that upon information and belief, the plaintiff lost patients who would have otherwise presented themselves for treatment
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Buckley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Bryson v. News America Publications, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court· 1996-10-24· cited 572×
- Robert E. Muzikowski v. Paramount Pictures Corporation, Sfx Tollin Robbins Incorporated, and Fireworks PicturesSeventh Circuit· 2003-04-24· cited 123×
- Dubinsky v. United Airlines Master Executive CouncilAppellate Court of Illinois· 1999-03-01· cited 80×
- Kurczaba v. PollockAppellate Court of Illinois· 2000-12-27· cited 71×
- Becker v. ZellnerAppellate Court of Illinois· 1997-09-16· cited 71×
- Schivarelli v. CBS, INC.Appellate Court of Illinois· 2002-08-16· cited 38×
- TUNCA v. PainterAppellate Court of Illinois· 2012-02-10· cited 36×
- Myers v. the TelegraphAppellate Court of Illinois· 2002-07-12· cited 27×
- Kapotas v. Better Government Ass'nAppellate Court of Illinois· 2015-05-26· cited 27×
- Salamone v. HOLLINGER INTERN., INC.Appellate Court of Illinois· 2004-03-30· cited 19×
- Rivera v. Allstate InsuranceN.D. Illinois· 2015-09-29· cited 19×
- Imperial Apparel, Ltd. v. Cosmo's Designer Direct, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois· 2006-07-31· cited 18×
- Salamone v. Hollinger International, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois· 2004-03-30· cited 14×
- Prakash v. ParulekarAppellate Court of Illinois· 2020-09-30· cited 14×
- Kole v. Village of NorridgeN.D. Illinois· 2013-04-19· cited 12×
- Rivera v. Allstate Insurance Co.Appellate Court of Illinois· 2021-06-14· cited 10×
- Patlovich v. RuddN.D. Illinois· 1996-11-20· cited 9×
- Morton Grove Pharmaceuts. v. National Pediculosis Association, Inc.N.D. Illinois· 2007-06-18· cited 6×
- Lott v. LevittN.D. Illinois· 2007-01-11· cited 5×
- 540 North Lake Shore Drive Condominium Ass'n v. MCZ Development Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois· 2025-03-18· cited 4×
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Chapski v. Copley PressIllinois Supreme Court· 1982-10-22· cited 206×
- Mittelman v. WitousIllinois Supreme Court· 1990-04-09· cited 174×
- Schaffer v. ZekmanAppellate Court of Illinois· 1990-03-30· cited 65×
- Rosner v. Field Enterprises, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois· 1990-12-24· cited 39×
- Taradash v. Adelet/Scott-Fetzer Co.Appellate Court of Illinois· 1993-12-27· cited 33×
- Appraisers Coalition v. Appraisal InstituteN.D. Illinois· 1994-02-15· cited 22×
- Halpern v. NEWS-SUN BROADCASTING CO., INC.Appellate Court of Illinois· 1977-10-14· cited 19×
- Homerin v. Mid-Illinois NewspapersAppellate Court of Illinois· 1993-05-19· cited 11×
- Lowe v. Rockford Newspaper, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois· 1989-02-02· cited 9×
- Anderson v. Vanden DorpelAppellate Court of Illinois· 1995-01-18· cited 7×
- May v. MyersAppellate Court of Illinois· 1993-12-30· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.