Barry G. Rattigan v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the defendant “knew of [his accomplice's] gun and benefitted from its presence for protection”
• mandating that a section 924(e) conviction must be sustained if a jury, on the record evidence, would be compelled to convict upon a proper post-Bailey instruction
• finding that cause existed for post- Bousley challenge of pre-Bailey instructions
• defendant may be convicted of aiding and abetting a § 924(c) violation even if the defendant never had actual possession of a firearm during the course of committing the crime

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).