· 10/11/2018
Barry Dayton v. Oakton Community College
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- listing the three grounds for which a Rule 59(e) motion for reconsideration would be appropriate
- “To the extent the plaintiffs are arguing that the jury’s verdict is somehow internally inconsistent . . . [t]hey waived any such argument by failing to object to the verdict before the jury was discharged.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Flaum
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.