Skip to main content
· 10/11/2018

Barry Dayton v. Oakton Community College

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • listing the three grounds for which a Rule 59(e) motion for reconsideration would be appropriate
  • “To the extent the plaintiffs are arguing that the jury’s verdict is somehow internally inconsistent . . . [t]hey waived any such argument by failing to object to the verdict before the jury was discharged.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Flaum

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.