Barrs v. Lockheed Martin Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Absent a promise or misrepresentation, the courts have almost uniformly rejected claims by plan participants or beneficiaries that an ERISA administrator has to volunteer individualized information taking account of their peculiar circumstances.”
• “We intimate no 24 view as to whether an assignment covering unspecified future policies would meet the statutory requirements for a QDRO, and if not, whether it would be enforceable.” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).