Barrow v. Talbott

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• disregarding a note that stated that portion of award was for future medical expenses
• appellee competent to testify about twitch in eye that developed after auto accident although doctor testified he could only guess twitch developed as result of severing facial nerve in accident
• “[W]hen a jury attempts to interpolate something in a verdict about which the jury has no concern, such interpolated matter is mere surplusage and not fatal to a judgment based on that verdict.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).