Skip to main content

Barrow v. State

Citations

  • 913 A.2d 569
  • 2006 WL 3579058

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding the claim that counsel were ineffective for failing to timely file a motion to suppress was barred by Rule 61(i)(4) because the court already found that admitting the statement did not prejudice the defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.