Supreme Court of Delaware· 12/11/2006
Barrow v. State
Citations
- 913 A.2d 569
- 2006 WL 3579058
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding the claim that counsel were ineffective for failing to timely file a motion to suppress was barred by Rule 61(i)(4) because the court already found that admitting the statement did not prejudice the defendant
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.