· 3/15/1832
Barrow v. Norwood
Citations
- 3 La. 437
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The Nevada Supreme Court has 6 found that Nevada's anti-retaliation statute tracks Title VII under federal law.”
- “The Nevada Supreme Court has found that Nevada's anti- 23 retaliation statute tracks Title VII under federal law.”
- “[T]o establish a prima facie case of 4 retaliation under the ADA, an employee must show that: (1) he or she engaged in a 5 protected activity; (2) suffered an adverse employment action; and (3) there was a causal link 6 between the two.”
- “[T]o establish a prima facie case of 24 retaliation under the ADA, an employee must show that: (1) he or she engaged in a 25 protected activity; (2) suffered an adverse employment action; and (3) there was a causal link 26 between the two.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.