· 8/7/2007
Barrow v. Abramowicz
Citations
- 931 A.2d 424
- 2007 Del. LEXIS 356
- 2007 WL 2254526
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that a defendant cannot complain about the use of a discovery deposition at trial (citation omitted)
- “We agree with the Barrows that Green controls and find the distinction between a trial deposition and a discovery deposition superfluous on the facts here.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Steele, Berger, Jacobs
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.