Skip to main content
· 8/7/2007

Barrow v. Abramowicz

Citations

  • 931 A.2d 424
  • 2007 Del. LEXIS 356
  • 2007 WL 2254526

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that a defendant cannot complain about the use of a discovery deposition at trial (citation omitted)
  • “We agree with the Barrows that Green controls and find the distinction between a trial deposition and a discovery deposition superfluous on the facts here.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Steele, Berger, Jacobs

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.