Skip to main content
· 3/30/2006

Barron v. Vanier

Citations

  • 190 S.W.3d 841
  • 2006 Tex. App. LEXIS 2516
  • 2006 WL 820394

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a letter ruling was not an appeal-able order when it was not filed and the trial court later rendered and filed a formal order
  • anti-SLAPP statute ‘‘establishes a proce- dure whereby the trial court evaluates the merits of the lawsuit using a summary-judgment-like procedure at an early stage of the litigation’’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cayce, Dauphinot, McCOY

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.