Barron v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• The defendant was not justified in using force against his spouse, from whom he was separated, to prevent her from taking personal property out of his car, because the property still belonged to them both. Thus, the defense of justification under OCGA § 16-3-24 (a) did not apply.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Yeomans v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2013-03-29· cited 14×
• Floyd v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2006-01-09· cited 6×
• Fleming v. Fleming
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2000-09-19· cited 4×
• Leslie v. the State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2017-06-14· cited 4×
• Keathley v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2010-07-19
• The State v. Morgan.
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2018-06-01

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Calloway v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1985-10-23· cited 14×
• Stanfield v. Stanfield
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1988-07-06· cited 12×
• Mitchell v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1993-05-24· cited 8×
• Shoemake v. Shoemake
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1991-06-25· cited 8×