Barron v. Eastpointe Human Servs. Lme

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that minor alterations inquiries “determine whether articles not expressly within the literal scope of a duty order may nonetheless be found within its scope as a result of a minor alteration to the merchandise covered in the investigation”
• sustaining Com- merce’s “minor alteration anti-circumvention affirmative determination” against Deacero as “in accordance with law and supported by substantial evidence”
• finding substantial evidence in Commerce’s conclusion that the smallest diameter steel wire rod produced in the investigated countries at the time the petition was filed was 5.5 mm
• “The purpose of minor alteration anticircumvention inquiries is to de- termine whether articles not expressly within the lit- eral scope of a duty order may nonetheless be found within its scope as a result of a minor alteration to merchandise covered in the investigation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).