Barron Electric Cooperative v. Public Service Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that agency's experience and expertise merit great-weight deference
• concluding that agency's experience and expertise merit great-weight deference
• discussing circumstances under which courts will pay varying degrees of deference to legal conclusions and statutory interpretations made by an \expert\ administrative agency in a case pending before it
• reviewing supreme court's discussion of standards of review of agency interpretations of statutes in Harnischfeger Corp. v. LIRC, 196 Wis. 2d 650, 539 N.W.2d 98 (1995)
• one single, factually distinguishable decision does not constitute a “prior agency practice” under § 227.57(8)
• agency need not have addressed specific or similar issue to be entitled to deference

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).