Barrientos v. 1801-1825 MORTON LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding “the enhanced voucher provision creates a right for tenants to remain in tenancy” such that tenancies can be terminated only for “the eviction grounds in subsection (o)(7)”
• concluding “the enhanced voucher provision creates a right for tenants to remain in tenancy” such that tenancies can be terminated only for “the eviction grounds in subsection (o)(7)”
• rejecting preemption claim when the asserted federal goal was “an important means to the ultimate end of providing housing, but not [actually] a goal in itself”
• “[The defendant] did not object to the scope of the injunction before the district court and, therefore, has waived the objection.”
• specifically citing de la Cuesta, 458 U.S. at 154, for the proposition that “[a] pre-emptive regulation’s COHEN V. APPLE 31 force does not depend on express congressional authorization to displace state law”
• “Further, an agency’s litigation position in an amicus brief is entitled to deference if there is no reason to suspect that the interpretation does not reflect the agency’s fair and considered judgment on the matter.” (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).