Barrett v. Williamson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Board may not assign a TDIU in the first instance when the schedular requirements of 38 C.F.R. § 4.16(a) are not met
• holding that the Board may not assign a TDIU in the first instance when the schedular requirements of 38 C.F.R. § 4.16(a) are not met
• holding that “whether a veteran is unable to secure and follow a substantially gainful employment is a question of fact” reviewed under the “clearly erroneous” standard
• finding that plausible evidence of unemployability warrants referral of TDIU claim to Director, C&P Service, for extraschedular consideration
• holding that § 4.16(b) applies to the Board
• remanding because, inter alia, Board, in adjudicating unemployability claim, failed to address evidence of record that appellant had been assigned GAF score of 50

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).