Barrett v. Whirlpool Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that “‘severe or pervasive’ is properly considered in the disjunctive”
• stating that case law “makes clear that we can consider evidence of other acts of harassment of which a plaintiff becomes aware during the period [of] his or her employment, even if the other acts were directed at others and occurred outside the plaintiff’s presence” (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).