Skip to main content
· 1/2/1906

Barrett v. Prince

Citations

  • 143 F. 302
  • 74 C.C.A. 440
  • 1906 U.S. App. LEXIS 3741

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding no common law or statutory fiduciary relationship existed between title agents and consumers for UTPCPL purposes

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baker, Grosscup, Seaman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.