Barrett v. Matthews

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting the lower court's conclusion that the appellant's petition was untimely under the PCRA and addressing the merits of the appellant's claim
• rejecting the lower court’s conclusion that the appellant’s petition was untimely under the PCRA and addressing the merits of the appellant’s claim
• rejecting the lower court’s conclusion that the appellant’s petition was untimely under the PCRA and addressing the merits of the appellant’s claim
• reversing order requiring registration of defendant convicted on May 12, 2009, of indecent assault graded as second degree misdemeanor
• reiterating prior Pennsylvania precedent that statutory and rule-based requirements governing PCRA petition do not apply to challenge to sex offender registration requirements and/or SVP designation because such claims do not pertain to underlying conviction or sentence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).