Skip to main content
· 8/13/2013

Barrett v. Lowe's Home Centers, Inc.

Citations

  • 179 Wash. App. 1
  • 324 P.3d 688

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that, “where language of a statute is clear and unambiguous, it must be given effect in accordance -8- J. S02005/19 with its plain and common meaning.” (citations omitted)
  • holding “when a defendant does not rest following a denial of a demurrer, but instead presents a defense, the correctness of the ruling on the demurrer is not preserved for appellate review, the proper procedure is to challenge the sufficiency of evidence”
  • sufficient evidence to prove criminal mischief under Section 3304(a)(2) where defendant scratched side of parked van with object held between two fingers
  • sufficient evidence to prove criminal mischief under Section 3304(a)(2) where defendant scratched side of parked van with object held between two fingers
  • sufficient evidence to prove criminal mischief under section 3304(a)(2) where defendant scratched side of parked van with - 13 - J-S59002-19 J-S59003-19 J-S59046-19 object held between two fingers

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bjorgen, Hunt, Penoyar

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.