Barrett v. Kirtland Community College

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reiterating that the Civil Rights Act is not so broad as to bar all conduct that is in any way related to sex
• reiterating that the Civil Rights Act is not so broad as to bar all conduct that is in any way related to sex
• noting that an “employee's charge must clearly convey to an objective employer that the employee is raising the specter of a claim of unlawful discrimination pursuant to [ELCRA]”
• noting that employees do not have to “specifically cite” ELCRA to be protected
• accepting without analysis that the nonrenewal of a contract was an adverse employment action but determining that the plaintiff was not entitled to relief because she could not establish causation
• to make a “charge” under the CRA, the employee must “clearly convey to an objective employer that the employee is raising the specter of a claim of unlawful discrimination pursuant to the CRA”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).