Skip to main content
· 10/15/1879

Barrett v. Johannes

Citations

  • 70 Mo. 439

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that, under totality of circumstances, officer’s threat of future prosecution did not overbear defendant’s will so as to vitiate voluntary nature of defendant’s statements
  • observing that the defendant was induced to stay at the hospital with the police because his children were being examined there, but emphasizing that in that case these \were not conditions created by the police to subject the defendant to continued questioning\
  • finding “no reviewable State constitutional claim presented” where “the defendant in his appeal relating to [a certain] issue wholly failed to raise anything but a federal constitutional claim and propositions in State case law relying entirely on federal law”
  • finding officer’s threat of future prosecution did not overbear defendant’s free will

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Henry

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.