Barrett v. H & R BLOCK, INC.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying jurisdictional discovery where “plaintiffs generally request[ed] discovery without any indication of the specific information they would seek or expect to find that would establish personal jurisdiction”
• “Although the First Circuit has not decided whether disparate impact claims are permissible under the ECOA, the circuit courts and many district courts that have decided the issue have uniformly concluded that they are.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).