Barrett v. Fournial

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that because the defendants did not request any 5 limiting instructions when evidence was admissible for one purpose but not for 6 another, they waived any right to complain of the district court’s alleged error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).