Barrett v. Barrett

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that when a transcript is -2- indispensable to the determination of the issues on appeal, the timely filing of a transcript is jurisdictional
• “[T]here is no authority in the Rules for this [C]ourt to extend the time for filing the transcript or written statement.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Turner v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1986-03-18· cited 300×
• Smith v. Com.
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 2011-03-04· cited 67×
• Goodpasture v. Goodpasture
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1988-09-06· cited 46×
• Bunton v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1988-07-19· cited 22×
• Smith v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2010-06-15· cited 19×
• Price v. Price
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1993-09-21· cited 18×
• Jordan v. Price
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1987-02-17· cited 14×
• Kyhl v. Kyhl
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2000-03-21· cited 4×

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Towler v. Commonwealth
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1976-01-16· cited 14×