Barrett v. Arizona

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• relying on Fish v. East , 114 F.2d 177 , 191 (10th Cir. 1940)
• “Once the consolidation has been ordered the subject guarantees, which represent multiple claims, are necessarily eliminated.”
• “Once the consolidation has been ordered the subject guarantees, which represent multiple claims, are necessarily eliminated.”
• Substantive consolidation of two corporate entities is appropriate “where a corporation is a mere instrumentality or alter ego of the bankrupt corporation with no independent existence of its own.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).