Barrett v. Apfel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• describing Daniels as the “best analysis” of the § 404.1563 and following the reasoning of that decision
• describing Daniels as the “best analysis” of the § 404.1563 and following the reasoning of that decision
• claimant’s case “simply was not a borderline situation” where he was over nine months away from fifty-fifth birthday on relevant date
• collecting cases holding that up to 6 months can qualify
• nine months was not borderline

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).