Barrett v. A&P Pac. Owner, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that in some instances a vagueness challenge to a constitutionally sufficient information may be waived by failure to request a bill of particulars
• stating the information must allege \the particular facts supporting [the elements ofthe crime]\
• assuming, without deciding, that the underlying crime is an element of the actual crime with which the defendant is being charged, and that to be constitutionally adequate the information as a whole needs to reasonably apprise the defendant of the underlying crime
• “Because [the appellant] does not argue that he was actually prejudiced by the State’s charging language, the information is constitutionally sufficient.” (citation omitted)
• defendant grabbed victim's cell phone from her hand while she was attempting to call the police and destroyed it by throwing it against a wall

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).