Barrett Manufacturing Co. v. Kennedy
Citations
- 73 Wash. 503
- 131 P. 1161
- 1913 Wash. LEXIS 1628
Syllabus
<p>Corporations — Foreign Corporations — Actions—Service of Process. The statute authorizing service of process upon the statutory agent of a foreign corporation is only cumulative, and service may be made under the general statute.</p> <p>Same — Service of Process — “Any Agent.” Under Rem. & Bal. Code, § 226, authorizing suit against a foreign corporation by service of process upon “any agent, cashier or secretary thereof,” service may be made upon any agent having representative authority, e. g., an agent having sole charge of defendant’s warehouse during the absence from the state of its statutory agent and resident manager, empowered to ship out and receive freight, make out shipping bills, sell goods and solicit orders; “agents” not being limited to agents of the class of “cashier or secretary.”</p>
Judges: Gose
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Pacific Typesetting Co. v. International Typographical UnionWashington Supreme Court· 1923-06-05· cited 31×
- State ex rel. Canadian Greyhound Lines, Ltd. v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court· 1946-12-19· cited 21×
- Grams v. Idaho National Harvester Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1919-02-27· cited 12×
- Frieze v. PowellWashington Supreme Court· 1914-05-06· cited 11×
- Faucher v. Burlington Northern, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington· 1979-11-27· cited 10×
- Watson v. Oregon Moline Plow Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1920-11-10· cited 6×
- United States v. Pacific Forwarding Co.W.D. Washington· 1934-10-26· cited 4×
- Sunada v. Oregon-Washington Railroad & Navigation Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1922-01-09· cited 3×
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Federal Betterment Co. v. ReevesSupreme Court of Kansas· 1906-02-10· cited 23×
- Norfolk & Western R. R. v. CottrellSupreme Court of Virginia· 1887-06-30· cited 21×
- Moinet v. Burnham, Stoepel & Co.Michigan Supreme Court· 1906-03-27· cited 15×
- Sievers v. Dalles, Portland & Astoria Navigation Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1901-03-22· cited 11×
- Lee v. Fidelity Storage & Transfer Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1908-12-11· cited 10×
- Womach v. Case Threshing Machine Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1911-03-31· cited 6×
- Erie Railroad v. Van AllenSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1908-02-24· cited 4×
- Tatum v. Niagara Fire InsuranceWashington Supreme Court· 1906-08-06· cited 3×
- Curtis v. JordanSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1905-12-04· cited 3×
- Arnold v. Huber Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court· 1911-06-02· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.