Skip to main content
· 10/19/2001

Barrett Ex Rel. Barrett v. Unified School District No. 259

Citations

  • 32 P.3d 1156
  • 272 Kan. 250
  • 2001 Kan. LEXIS 610

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that recreational-use immunity would not apply to parking lots because, unlike recreational facilities, schools would develop parking lots regardless of immunity incentives
  • holding the recreational use exception eliminates any liability of the defendants for ordinary negligence
  • holding the recreational use exception eliminates any liability of the defendants for ordinary negligence
  • stating legal duty may arise by case law or by statute
  • student died from heat stroke at football practice due to coach’s alleged negligence and gross negligence
  • after holding KTCA’s recreational use exception provided immunity, no need to consider KTCA’s discretionaiy function exception

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Davis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.