Skip to main content
· 9/7/1994

Barrett Business Services v. Hames

Citations

  • 881 P.2d 816
  • 130 Or. App. 190
  • 1994 Ore. App. LEXIS 1368

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • consequential condition under ORS 656.005(7)(a)(A) exists when a claimant suffers a new injury
  • when a new injury is the direct result of reasonable and necessary treatment of a compensable injury, the compensable injury is the major contributing cause of the new injury, which is compensable as a consequential condition

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Deits, Riggs, Haselton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.