Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 3/21/1956
Barrera v. State
Citations
- 289 S.W.2d 285
- 163 Tex. Crim. 132
- 1956 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1001
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- a prosecution begins with the filing of a complaint or the return of an indictment
- a prosecution begins with the filing of a complaint or the return of an indictment
- “It was immaterial that the cattle were removed from and returned to the owner’s pasture. Having placed his ear mark on all of the stolen cattle and his brand upon some of them, theft of the cattle was complete.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Morrison
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Howland v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1998-03-12· cited 106×
- Vasquez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1977-11-16· cited 66×
- Empty v. StateTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1998-07-24· cited 44×
- Snellen v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 1996-05-24· cited 34×
- Haney v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1998-07-02· cited 27×
- Pueblo v. Tribunal Superior de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico· 1961-11-24· cited 21×
- Bonner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1992-05-28· cited 11×
- Jeremy Deashun Brown Jr. v. StateTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2018-11-07
- People v. Superior Court of Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico· 1961-11-24
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.