Barrera-Lopez v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that pro se plaintiff's bald assertions that the United States acted with malice were not sufficient to require the court to undertake a de novo review of the United States' certifications
• finding that pro se plaintiff's bald assertions that the United States acted with malice were not sufficient to require the court to undertake a de novo review of the United States' certifications
• state law principles govern whether government employee was acting within the scope of his or her employment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).